Going back to my childhood, every childhood contest I was involved with whether it was for school, sports, Boy Scouts, treated it as the "everyone's a winner" concept.Every kid was declared a prize and there was no "winners" and "losers".

Going back to my childhood, every childhood contest I was involved with whether it was for school, sports, Boy Scouts, treated it as the "everyone's a winner" concept sports help keep inner city kids out of trouble. Every kid was declared a prize and there was no "winners" and "losers". Now the question is why bother having a competition where everyone will turn out the winner? In my younger adulthood now I don't necessarily agree with this because i feel it is good to show your kids that not everyone excels in everything that they do and to learn the concept of accepting defeat. If you win at everything you attempt you wouldn't know how to accept defeat as you get older, respectfully sports help keep inner city kids out of trouble. How do you other parents feel on the "everyone's a winner" thing being used? sports help keep inner city kids out of trouble.

Clarice-Trevithick said:

• I believe that for younger children, probably before age 7 or 8, the "everyone's a winner" concept is preferable because at that age what is most important is that they have a healthy level of self-esteem, pride in their accomplishments, and sense of self-worth.
• Contests at that age, understandably, aren't about level of skill so the value of them is how they make the child feel.
• As the child gets older, though, I do believe that the contests should be actual contests because when they do enter the real world, the person who gets the promotion or project is the person who worked the hardest and "won" their place fairly.
• That is an important concept to learn not only so people know how to handle and accept defeat but also so they know how to evaluate their own level of talent or work and make adjustments if they did not land where they wanted to.
• I guess I missed the "everyone's a winner" phase.
• Even when I was 4 and 5, there were winners and losers at softball games and sparring at karate class.
• In fact, it was because I was so easily defeated during a sparring match at that age that made me rethink whether I actually wanted to be in karate or not because I did not show enough aptitude (or discipline) for the art.
• I decided to refocus my attention to softball instead where I did show an aptitude and talent.
• Failure can be a very good teacher and it does not necessarily have to be a completely and utterly destroying concept to the child as long as they have several things in their life that makes them feel good about who they are.
• It is important to learn that not everyone is good at everything and that they need to evaluate what they are good at and choose to do those things that both make them happy and for which they show a talent for.
• Just my feelings.
• If I had a young child, I would probably opt to put them in those soccer leagues where everyone gets to play to learn how to work with other people as a part of a team but I would also enroll them in other classes and sports they were interested in where there are clearly defined winners and losers, especially as they got older.
• Peace,Jenn

Elly-Ehret said:
Didn't have them when I was a kid sports help keep inner city kids out of trouble. I lost a lot; when I won it made it that much bigger a deal. If you never lose, how do you learn to handle defeat when the real world craps on you? Not a fan sports help keep inner city kids out of trouble.

Conrad-Treeby said:
It's for pansy azzes

• this concept would be great if we lived in a utopia where everyone is equal, but sadly, we don't.
• I believe a little competition should be encouraged at athletic events and such.
• kids should be taught that if you wanna win, you're gonna have to put in some effort.
• The problem is with the parents that drive their kids to believe that it's not ok to loseYou are a winner in one respect for just trying, but I think the "everyone's a winner" concept takes the glory from the "truly talented" kids.
• When one of my kids came home with a "winner ribbon", and did not really win, he through it in the trash the next day!

Yoshie-Weinstein said:
I think that it doesn't teach them to be humble when they lose something at an older age. They certainly didn't have this concept when I was younger, and I think that it made me try harder because of it.

Ernest-Lineman said:
I'd say it's fine for toddlers, to keep them from being discouraged early, when you're trying to get them interested in games, but kids are obviously smarter than adults in this instance, and they see through the B.S. soon enough. In every major competitive American sport at least, someone's keeping score, and kids know their parents and coaches want them to get the best score. Throughout the rest of their lives, at college and at work, their performance is going to be measured constantly, and they might as well get used to it early. (Yes, I let my kid beat me most of the time when I'm introducing a new board or card game, by the way, but does he return the favor when we play video games? Ooooooh no, he loves slamming Daddy down and talking smack to me.)

Modesto-Eggbert said:
It's complete BS that inspires mediocrity and contributes to the wave of useless humans that are beginning to populate the adult world. This is exactly the same concept as schools/parents telling their children that nobody is "best" at anything. Even for younger children, it's up to the PARENT to encourage their child when they feel discouraged from losing or being in last place. It helps build a strong parent/child connection and reinforces that even in horrible odds, the child can still prevail.It's untrue, their are winners, losers, and definitely people who are "best" at something.most likely playing computer games instead. For one thing kids need to learn that games are made up of rules and its the rules that make it fun. Because they will understand its a game. Kids who are raised on the"everyone's a winner" concept fail to understand games. when a child finds a game they like and understands all the rules losing wont make them feel like a loser. And dont enjoy real games when the grow up.

Johnetta-Leach said:
I like it ok for some things, especially when effort does not matter. I don't like it for other things. Kids still need to learn how to compete and deal with disappointment. If they don't, it will be difficult for them when they are older. A better idea is this: DO have a winner and a loser. But still give out prizes to the "losers." Kids deserve to be rewarded for their effort so they know that hard work and perserverance will be rewarded, win or lose. But contending with winning and losing is still important. Making all contests and sports an "everyone's a winner" thing basically just makes the games dull, and doesn't really teach kids anything.

Percy-Jewell said:
i think it is good to let every kid win but also it can be a bad thing because they will think they are always going to win, and it just doesn't work out that way in life sports help keep inner city kids out of trouble.

Argelia-Sommer said:

• Seems like it's a hard balance.
• Either you have the "everyone is a winner" dilution, or there is this huge emphasis on who the actual winner of the competition is, and everyone else feels insignificant.
• Some kids will NEVER win, but they still should get some kind of boost for the fact that they are participating.I think kids need to know that everyone is a winner, even if it is a small prize.
• Let them also know that there was a certain 2 or 3 that excelled and received a larger prize for doing so.
• It is the same as winning and loosing but is easier for kids to comprehend and understand.

Hosea-Thompson said:
In the real, adult, world, everyone is NOT a winner. The majority are not winners. The quicker kids learn this concept, the better equipped they will be to deal with it as adults.There are other ways to improve self-esteem. I can't understand how a kid seeing everyone get a participation award improves his/her self-esteem..

Maggie-Brooks said:

• The everyone's a winner attitude does not prepare kids for life's disappointments.
• Children need to experience loss to learn how to persevere.
• Whoever thought that up is a loser!

Cary-Keppel said:
it is ridiculous

Shane-Potter said:
While childhood should be enjoyed, I believe it should also train children for life in the grown-up world and nowadays, it doesn't. It depends on the contest and the age of the contestants, but overall, I think it's a bad concept because it fosters an attitude of entitlement sports help keep inner city kids out of trouble sports help keep inner city kids out of trouble. Life itself is unfair and when kids grow up and move into the workplace and find out that breaks and opportunities are handed out to those who earn them, it's a rude awakening that many can't deal with.

Hulda-Flickinger said:
well i'm not an adult, but i don't agree with that concept. They have to learn that some people are better than them at some things Winning all tht time will make kids think they don't have to try.

Marin-Laurenzi said:
I agree with you. How can a child develope to know his strengths and weaknesses if he's told he's good at everything? That's an unrealistic assessment of anyone, adults included and, like you said, how is a child supposed to be prepared for real life, later?Losing, sometimes, is an unavoidable fact of life. Learning to accept defeats and set backs, graciously and accepting them as a part of life is essential in a child's development. I think the rise of depression among young people can be tied, directly, to being unprepared for the moments in life when things don't go right. There are times when things don't go your way and sometimes, you have to assess your actions and see what went wrong. These should be times to learn, adapt and correct, but it seems many young people these days are crushed, not motivated to improve. I think that stems from the unrealistic expectations created by the "everyone's a winner" philosophy. The reality is that some are winners in some areas, some in others. Very few are winners in everything and there's a danger in creating that false impression in the minds of our kids. It leaves them unprepared to lose.Life is competitive to varying degrees in a variety of areas. Competition by its nature means there is a winner and a loser. What's the value in winning if it isn't special? If everyone is considered equal? When I was in Boy Scouts, for example, competions held rewards for the winner. Why should I try to excel at knot tying when I win and get the same acknowledgement as the guy who doesn't know a boline from a sheepshank? I studied, learned and practiced my knots so I could excel, but my efforts wouldn't mean much, would they, if they brought the same recognition as the guys who were awful? By refusing to recognize that we're not all equal, not all winners, we're depriving the acheivers of recognition for their accomplishments. We're also, subtely, saying that's it OK to lose and that's a message we shouldn't be repeating too often.

Omar-Quirin said:
i dont believe in this personally kids should learn at a young age that not everthing happens their way! they will be good at things and bad at things. later when they realize there are loser and there on that side they throw fits or are sore losers. in my opinion its ok for kids to loose they will be find the sooner they learn to deal with it the better.

Maybelle-Sheets said:
I don't like it sports help keep inner city kids out of trouble. Also, that you must work hard to achieve excellence.I think that it why so many kids are spoiled today sports help keep inner city kids out of trouble. Kids have to grow up understanding that you can not be great at everything and that you can't have everything.

sports help keep inner city kids out of trouble Promotion: